Prepared for a
week of fun and relaxation on a lavish cruise, an unfortunate few experience
anything but. While these luxury vacations at sea are designed as an escape
from the dreary day-to-day lives of its passengers, the most evil elements of
the real world occasionally sneak onto the ships with ill-intentioned
vacation-goers. Crime, especially sexual assault, runs rampant on cruises.
Worse yet, the legal convolution of international waters often leaves victims
with long-lasting emotional trauma while perpetrators go unpunished. From 2001
to 2006, 28 people simply disappeared from commercial cruise lines and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened more than 300 cases of crimes
committed at sea (Weiner).
Many people have
either been on a cruise or have close friends or family who have. The amount of
unpunished and unreported crime on cruise ships affects everyone, and it is our
responsibility as citizens of a free nation to ensure the safety of all, even
those of us traveling abroad. This epidemic of crime on commercial cruise ships
is an avoidable problem that vigilance by citizens and legislators can cure. A
lack of preventative action now could put you and your loved ones at risk in
the future.
Like most leisure
and vacation industries, cruises are a relatively new form of entertainment.
While maritime history dates back millennia, only within the last two centuries
have seafaring vessels opened their decks for relaxation. Beginning in 1844,
the Pacific and Oriental Steam Navigation Company (P&O) offered excursions
for wealthy passengers throughout the Mediterranean (The History of Cruising
and Cruise Ships). At this time, P&O was primarily a trading company, but
they soon realized the economic viability of leisure excursions. Within the
coming years, vast improvements to comfort and safety along with an expanded
list of available ports made cruise lines the pinnacle of pre-Great Depression
luxury (The History of Cruising and Cruise Ships).
Now relatively
affordable and accessible to a wide range of people, cruise lines like Carnival
and Royal Caribbean are wildly lucrative businesses, with ships often described
as “floating cities” equipped with streets, restaurants, bars, casinos, and
clubs (Kozlowska). Micky Arison, the CEO of Carnival, is the richest man in
Florida with a net worth of 9.7 billion dollars (Micky Arison). However, a
darker side of the industry, riddled with scandal, corruption, and bribery,
lies hidden beneath the thin façade of a comfortable and safe vacation alternative.
Not only has Carnival been accused
of tax evasion, the company is registered in Panama to further avoid
governmental investigation by the United States (Walker).
While cruise lines
offer a brief reprieve from day to day life, they cannot guarantee a suspension
of man’s inhumanity to man, and the increased affordability of cruises has
allowed a greater diversity of people to attend. As a wider subset of the
population is loaded onto enormous boats to sail for days at a time, the darker
facets of society are bound to follow. Crime onboard cruise ships does not
occur at a higher rate than on land, but it does occur. This, certainly, is not
the cruise line’s fault. Where the issue lies, however, is in the cruise line’s
ineffectual, and sometimes underhanded, methods of dealing with such issues (Walker).
Crime onboard
commercial cruises has a direct effect on those onboard, as well as their
friends and families. To ignore matters of policy regarding these companies is
to put future vacation-goers in harm’s way. A large portion of sexual assault
on board cruises involves female minors who, due to international laws, can
drink alcohol in many port cities (Kozlowska). However, due to the
circumstantial nature of cases of sexual assault and the markedly lower
international age of consent, these crimes rarely see justice (Kozlowska).
However, the
implications of what cruise lines can get away with have wide-reaching
implications in international law, including the legal jurisdiction of the
United States. The FBI’s jurisdiction is affected by “the location of the
vessel, the nationality of the perpetrator or victim, the ownership of the
vessel, the points of embarkation and debarkation, and the country in which the
vessel is flagged,” as well as the jurisdiction of other nations (Crimes
against Americans on Cruise Ships). However, if the crime occurs outside US
jurisdiction, it is the responsibility of the local government to investigate.
These governments are often stretched thin with domestic problems, rarely
investigating matters involving citizens of other nations (Kozlowska). These
matters of international and maritime law extend far beyond commercial cruise
lines. Private boat owners, maritime companies, oceanic oil operations, and
international travelers are all affected by decisions largely influenced by the
cruise industry.
In 2016, 4
suspicious deaths, 6 missing persons, 6 thefts of more than 10,000 dollars, 14
assaults with serious injury, and 62 sexual assaults were alleged onboard US
cruise ships (Cruise Line Incident Reports). These numbers are likely higher
than have been reported (Kozlowska). Many victims, especially of sexual
assault, do not report the crimes in the first place. Those that do often find
reporting a case through the proper channels difficult onboard cruise ships.
Private security is the first line of authority in dealing with crime and, due
to their financial ties with the cruise lines, are often hostile to and
uncooperative with victims (Walker). Cruise lines also offer significant sums
of money to victims to ensure that the crime goes unreported, saving the
company’s reputation in the process (Walker).
A prime example of
the difficult nature of these cases allegedly occurred on July 29, 2015 on
Norwegian Cruise Lines. A 17-year-old American girl, who wishes to remain
anonymous, was allegedly raped by a male passenger. After hours of questioning
on the ship, followed by medical tests and prescriptions for noxious anti-STD
medication, the girl and her family were sent back to New York, where they met
with the FBI (Another Teenage Rape Victim). Due to the “he-said, she-said”
nature of the case and the FBI’s lack of jurisdiction in Europe, the family was
told that no legal action would be taken against the perpetrator.
While these
reports have never been confirmed or denied by the FBI or Norwegian Cruise
Lines, the fact remains that incidents like this are entirely possible.
Additionally, there is no legislation that requires cruise lines to release
incident reports to the FBI if the cruise doesn’t dock in US territory, adding
another level of complexity to the already convoluted situation surrounding
international cruises (Another Teenage Rape Victim).
The adversarial
and callous nature of cruise lines in the face of tragic circumstances is once
again evident in the case of Larry and Christy Hammer. On April 10th,
2016, Larry and Christy’s cabin onboard a ship owned by International
Explorations caught fire, filling their room with poisonous smoke and killing
them both within minutes. Their family has not received official times of death
and were forced to hire private investigators to uncover the circumstances of
their loved ones’ deaths (Lankford and Malott).
It has been
discovered that the power-strips in the cabin lacked surge protection and that
there were no smoke detectors on board. Security footage revealed that crew
members took nearly twenty minutes to rescue the couple, despite strict
regulations on emergency training for employees. The ship had been deemed safe
to sail despite these glaring breeches of safety protocol and was again declared
safe to sail less than a day after the fire occurred, despite the cause of the
fire having not yet been determined. Despite the company’s registration in the
United States, International Explorations has taken no legal responsibility in
the case and has offered no compensation for the tragedy (Lankford and Malott).
Due to the complex
nature of crime on board cruise ships and the convolution of international
maritime law, this criminal epidemic is a difficult problem with no clear or
easy solution. While extensive background checks for potential cruise customers
as well as increased isolation for passengers in port cities would vastly
improve overall safety, these reforms would dramatically reduce the volume of
passengers and likely put cruise companies out of business
due to plummeting profits. Similar
solutions would be difficult to mandate and enforce due to
cruise lines’ foreign registration.
While security
forces are currently present on cruises, their salaries come directly from the
cruise line, and are frequently biased against, and occasionally hostile
toward, victims (Weiner). A potential solution for this social epidemic would
be to have competent and well-trained security forces on all cruise ships, funded
by a neutral third party. An international cooperation between port countries
and the United States would be able to regulate such a complex matter. Such an
organization would also have jurisdiction in every place necessary to conduct a
comprehensive investigation.
In addition, the
screening process for cruise line employees should be conducted by a neutral
third party and made more extensive via federal law. Presently, the background
check required by cruise lines consists only of a certificate ensuring that
they are not criminals
provided by the employee’s home
country (Walker). Many of these countries have far less sophisticated
crime-reporting systems than the United States, and these certificates have
proven
to be easily forgeable (“Crime on
Cruise Ships”).
In the face of
immense public pressure, recent developments in federal law have extended the
reach of the United States in the investigation of crime committed against
American citizens on cruises. However, the FBI still does not have explicit
jurisdiction in other countries and cannot infringe on the rights of other
nations in their pursuit of foreign criminals (“Cruise Vessel Security and
Safety Act of 2010; Implementation”). Current federal law can only improve passengers’
ability to report crime through the proper channels by stationing American
authorities onboard. The Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act (CVSSA) improved
reporting standards on cruises and made steps in the right direction toward
passenger safety, but such laws have proven to be difficult to enforce on
vessels in international waters (“Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of
2010; Implementation”).
Since criminal
investigations are primarily left up to underfunded and understaffed
governments throughout the Caribbean, another possible solution to this
epidemic is to improve these investigations (“Cruise Line Incident Reports”).
This solution would be ideal, but would take by far the most time, money, and
effort. Raising the standard of living in port countries would decrease crime
and take pressure off their governments, allowing for more resources to be
allocated to international investigation. In an ideal world, each country would
work together to bring every perpetrator to justice, aided by well-trained crew
members and sophisticated on-board security. However, cruise lines must make a
profit and not all governments are well enough equipped to handle a complex
international investigation.
Albert Camus,
French-Algerian novelist and philosopher, believed strongly that what makes us
human is our paradoxical struggle to find meaning in a meaningless universe (Simpson).
His fundamental question of whether to have coffee or to commit suicide is a
shocking and revealing representation of his philosophy, which has become known
as Absurdism. This absurd paradox surrounds us every day, and those that
embrace it are forced to constantly evaluate their actions and the motives
behind them (Simpson). The lack of accountability within the cruise industry
and subsequent tragedies are no exception to the permeation of the
Absurd into daily life. Camus, although a dreary and depressive person
throughout his life, would certainly not have rejoiced in seeing the pain of
those suffering on cruises (Aronson). On the contrary, Camus’ extensive
political activism implies that the author would be a
strong advocate of cruise law reform.
However, Camus
would be able to find a silver lining to the epidemic: that people have begun
to challenge authority and to effect change in society. These people are
fighting for justice in a random and chaotic universe, thereby accepting the
absurd without succumbing to the helplessness it implies. He would be glad that
people are angry about the state of the world and
want to change it, just as he did
in his politically active and turbulent youth.
There is a high
probability that you or a loved one will go on a cruise and be directly
affected by the maritime jurisdiction of the United States. Furthermore, the
laws governing cruise lines affect international relations and maritime law,
which have enormous implications in the daily lives of everyone on the planet.
These
wide-reaching effects permeate into all aspects of life, including
international trade and private maritime leisure activities (Walker). It is our
responsibility as citizens of a democracy to ensure the safety of all, even
those travelling abroad. Therefore, the burden of this social epidemic falls on
us all to cure, to petition our lawmakers and affect change in our society.
Works
Cited
Aronson,
Ronald. “Albert Camus.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford
University, 10 Apr. 2017, plato.stanford.edu/entries/camus/.
“Another
Teenage Rape Victim.” Another Teenage Rape Victim, International Cruise Victims,
www.internationalcruisevictims.org/LatestMemberStories/Another_Teenage_Rape_Victim.html
“Crimes
against Americans on Cruise Ships.” FBI, FBI, 27 Mar. 2007, www.archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/crimes-against-americans-on-cruise-ships.
“Cruise
Line Incident Reports.” US Department of Transportation, United States
Department of Transportation, 12 Nov. 2015, www.transportation.gov/mission/safety/cruise-line-incident-reports.
Kozlowska,
Hanna. “Why Cruise Ships Have a Sexual Assault Problem.” Quartz, Quartz, 6 July
2017, www.qz.com/1022245/why-cruise-ships-have-a-sexual-assault-problem/.
Malot,
Jill, and Kelley Lankford. “Larry and Kristi Hammer.” Larry and Kristi Hammer, www.internationalcruisevictims.org/LatestMemberStories/Larry_and_Kristi_Hammer.html
“Micky
Arison.” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, www.forbes.com/profile/micky_arison/.
Simpson,
David. “Camus.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu/camus/.
“The
History of Cruising and Cruise Ships.” Traveling with the jones RSS, www.travelingwiththejones.com/2014/06/26/the-history-of-cruising-and-cruise-ships/.
Walker,
Jim. “Cruise Crime Cover Up: Cruise Lines Report Only Small Fraction of Crimes
to the Public.” Cruise Law News, Walker and O’Neill Maritime Lawyers, 27 Feb.
2014, www.cruiselawnews.com/2014/02/articles/crime/cruise-crime-cover-up-cruise-lines-report-only-small-fraction-of-crimes-to-the-public/.
Walker,
Jim. “Do Cruise Lines Conduct Background Checks of Crew Members?” Cruise Law
News. Walker and O’Neill Maritime Lawyers, 9 June 2013,
www.cruiselawnews.com/2013/06/articles/rape-1/do-cruise-lines-conduct-background-checks-of-crews-members/.
Weiner,
Eric. “Cruise Ship Crimes in International Waters.” NPR, NPR, 8 Mar. 2006, www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5251675
No comments:
Post a Comment